DISCLAIMER: This will be tedious and uninteresting to anyone who doesn’t want to hear about our curriculum in detail. Read at your own risk. I cannot be responsible for damage done by drool if you venture any further and fall asleep at the keyboard.
The other day
JJ left a comment here asking some questions about
Tapestry of Grace (TOG), the curriculum we’ve been using for the bulk of schoolwork this year:
Say, how are you feeling about TOG at this point in the school year? Planning on sticking with it? What have been the challenges, if any, to overcome with it? What would you change, if anything, about the implementation of it over this past year?
I should start out by saying that the reason I chose TOG is because I believed it would be the best way to accomplish the following requirement I set for my curriculum: balance structure with freedom. Last summer when I chose TOG as our curriculum for this year, I wrote a
post explaining my decision further. As we’re seeing the end of our first year approaching, I am satisfied that this curriculum did exactly what I hoped it would. I’ve had the yearly and weekly outlines available to keep me disciplined (i.e. "This is what you’re studying this week"), but I’ve felt enough flexibility to be able to substitute my own books when desired, to take a week of school off when we need to, or to completely rearrange our schedule for a week to . . . oh, let’s say . . . dedicate an entire day to a
Purim celebration.
Therefore, you might be completely surprised when I tell you that I don’t plan to continue with TOG next year. Here’s why . . . the publisher of TOG is currently in the process of redesigning the curriculum and updating the recommended booklist. She’s starting with Year 1 (what we’re using right now) and hopes to have the redesigned version available for purchase beginning this fall (2006). Then she’ll begin Year 2, but at the present rate it won’t be available until Fall 2007. So if we continue with TOG next year, we’ll always be one year behind the redesign. This isn’t necessarily a problem, because we could just buy what is now being called "Classic TOG" and use that throughout the education of our children. But because the redesign addresses and corrects some of the problems I had with Classic TOG and because we’re just beginning our education journey, I’d prefer to use the new TOG. Another option is to continue with Classic TOG and purchase the Redesigned Year 1 when we begin the cycle over again in three years. However, this means spending more money in order to buy two sets of what is essentially the same curriculum (although Lampstand Press has graciously offered a partial refund to those of us who have already purchased or will purchase portions of Classic TOG).
At this point, my plan for next fall is to take a year off TOG and pursue some of the things I keep telling myself we’ll do when we have "more time" . . . things like foreign language, music, and art . . . and then continue where we left off with Year 2 in the fall of 2007. These plans are not set in stone–I may change my mind and decide to go ahead with TOG–but right now I’m leaning towards waiting for a year.
If you’d like more information about the TOG Redesign project, they’ve set up a
page on their website devoted to answering questions.
As far as the challenges I’ve had to overcome this year . . . one of the things the publisher of TOG warns against frequently is the temptation to try to do everything suggested by the curriculum. There are
so many ideas available through TOG that it’s impossible for any family to do all of them. If I tried I would burn out myself and my children very quickly. So I’ve had to keep in mind that TOG is a buffet rather than a family-style meal. I have to make decisions about what will work for our family and what I ought to leave out. That can be challenging when I feel like I might be missing out on something interesting, fun or worthwhile (it helps for me to keep in mind that I’m going to be going through the TOG cycle three times with each child, so we’ll have a chance to cover everything again). For instance, I started out the year trying to do the writing assignments that were recommended each week in TOG. However, I found that they weren’t fitting with my philosophy of teaching writing nor was Baba much interested in them. So I decided to skip the writing assignments altogether and instead teach grammar using
First Language Lessons for the Well-Trained Mind. We’ll probably pick up with TOG writing in a few years when Baba will be better-equipped to do his own writing.
Are there things I would change about the way I’ve implemented TOG? Definitely. I wish I would have made better use of the Student Activity Pages (SAP). I wish we would have taken more time to discuss the books we’ve read using the questions from the SAP. I wish I would have started out the year with a better understanding of the story behind history so that I could have done a better job of tying together the threads. However, these are mistakes from which I can learn . . . and, like I said, we’ll be covering this stuff again at least twice.
Hope that answers your questions, JJ. Are you sorry you asked?
PS – One more thing I forgot to mention . . . I think it would have helped me very much to have someone experienced with TOG to guide me through the process. Now that I have a year under my belt, I’m available to help if you need it.